[Featured Resource] Exploring the links between experiences of injustice and violent conflict

featuredresource
featured-j4a
advocacy
justiceforall

(Michael Otto) #1

This is the 6th week of our 10 Weeks of Action and focuses on peace and security for our Featured Resource, which is: Exploring the links between experiences of injustice and violent conflict.

In this policy brief from the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law and Saferworld, @wlabennett argues that we need to come to a better understanding of the experience of injustice in order to really address the underlying drivers of conflict and injustice itself.

This policy brief is part of a peace and justice blog series by Saferworld.

More about Exploring the links between experiences of injustice and violent conflict:

Experiences of injustice increase the risk of violent behaviours. In this policy brief, the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law and Saferworld make the case for a better understanding of experiences of injustice; and, how addressing those experiences could have a significant bearing on conflict dynamics.

To this end – Exploring the links between experiences of injustice and violent conflict – recommends thinking of injustice as a series of multi-stakeholder problems to be solved. This opens up a vast array of policy and programming options to tailor peace and justice work to each context, and moves us away from single policy thinking (on security and justice, rule of law, SSR, business, gender, the environment, education, etc.) that is unlikely to resolve the complexity of people’s day-to-day justice problems. More collaboration by diverse actors in the spaces where their fields connect and collide would offer a much richer selection of ways and means to work.

This brief argues that providing justice is not the preserve of justice providers. Coherence is crucial; and whilst Goal 16 – on peace, justice and strong institutions – provides welcome impetus for peace and justice work, there is little agreement on how to deliver on its ambitions. So a commitment to experimentation, better coordination and more knowledge sharing ought to be a matter of priority.

Finally, this brief suggests asking three questions to advance this way of working on justice:

  1. What is the justice problem and how is it governed?
  2. How is it connected to violence?
  3. What changes are needed, and what coalition of actors and fields could offer the most transformative response?

You can access this resource in our library at the following link:

If you have any questions or thoughts to share about the policy brief, comment below for @wlabennett. (Hi Will!)


The Featured Resource is a short profile of a key resource found in the resource library of the Global Legal Empowerment Network. These resources can be older or brand new, but they all touch on important themes within legal empowerment. If you have a resource you would like to profile with the network, upload it directly at this link or email it to community@namati.org



How likely are you to recommend the Global Legal Empowerment Network?



Thank you. What can we do better?

Thank you. What can be improved?

Fabulous! What do you like most?

Thanks for giving feedback! If you’re reporting a problem, please tell us what you were doing when the problem occurred, what you expected to happen and what actually happened.

 

skip this step